Strong evidence to support shift in the position of sponges in animal classification

The position of sponges and Ctenophores in the tree of life poses a major problem in understanding the evolution of animals in recent years. A new study published in Current Biology by Paul Simion, Hervé Philippe (whose arrival at SETE was accompanied by a TULIP Package in 2013) and Michael Manuel seeks to overcome this problem by sampling a greater number of species and genes while eliminating possible erroneous data from high throughput sequencing.

The Ctenophores, what are they?

Ctenophores are planktonic marine organisms scattered throughout the world's oceans. Carnivores, they move thanks to locomotive cilia in order to reach their prey. They constitute a good part of the global planktonic biomass. The best known ctenophores are sea currant (Pleurobrachia pileus) and the belt of Venus (Cestum veneris).

The novel aspect of this study is the construction of a data set of 1,719 genes that surpassed in size and quality the previous datasets used to treat phylogenetic kinship relationships between metazoan. The authors set out to use many more quality controls at all stages and proposed several methodological innovations to avoid a range of data errors resulting from contamination in high-throughput sequencing or potentials sequencing errors themselves, as well as gene duplications.

The origin of the nervous system and the muscles

Several studies supported a typology in which the ctenophores are the brother group of all other animals (including Porifera group sponges). On the other hand, other phylogenomic studies supported the alternative scenario in which sponges (Porifera) are the sister group of all other animals (including the ctenophores), a hypothesis consistent with a single origin of the intestine, nerve cells and of muscle cells.

The results of Simion et al. suggest that sponges (Porifera) and not the Ctenophores are the first lineage to separate from other animals, supporting the classic view of morphologists. Indeed, the phylogeny established by Simion et al. suggests that the muscles and the nervous system appeared later than what the phylogeny supporting the Ctenophores supports the basis of animals.

These results, which are much more consistent with models of the appearance of animals from unicellular plants, point out that methodological problems must be carefully addressed and resolved in order to address difficult phylogenetic issues.

Modification date : 16 November 2017 | Publication date : 17 October 2017 | Redactor : Guillaume Cassiède-Berjon & Hervé Philippe